anticharisma
     
 

The way it should be for your path in life is that you stay chaste and good and disciplined and focused when young and debaucheries when older. Why? Well Plenty of people sleep around when they're young; only to find out that they are venerially diseased to the point that they will pass one many std's to their children in the womb, or worse still, that they cannot have kids due to things like undiagnosed chlamydia and so on. From this stand point, isn't it better to party hard after you've produced your next-gen-you?

I think that despite conventional wisdom saying that people will sow their wild oats young and get serious later, that in fact now a days oldies you will find, are the highest proportion of people catching venereal disease in the whole of society. Older people - baby boomers, have paid off the mortgage seen their kids born healthy and grown up to self sufficiency (In most cases) and then boomers turn their attention to free-love 1960's type behaviour. Hence the booming Boomer infection rate. Wouldn't you feel more comfortable sleeping around after you had kids instead of before? Surely their is less risk in the grand scheme of your life and more benefit? I mean why in traditional society did we (We still do right?) cherish and value virginity particularly female virginity as a high ideal and a highly desirable factor in choosing a mate/wife? Well because a wife was to make your children your son to run your concern when you get old and your wife had better be a virgin on your wedding night or you could have a long commitment to a baron baby factory or a factory that produces faulty goods. Back then of course people married at 17 years old, where as now a days they get hitched at 32 ish. So in all that time from puberty to baby making time, there is now ample opportunity for the individual to succumb to their desires and ruin their reproductive system - before the egg is hatched so to speak. But is it realistic to expect a person to abstain or be really conservative with dating for that 10-15 year period between puberty and modern day marriage? Probably not, so what then? Maybe the olden days ways need a revival? Getting hitched at 20 something sounds good to me but how do I convince the girl to have kids young? Shed run for the hills! We all know the economic structure of today favours those who hold off starting a family until all the following is over and done with: High school, university, junior work years. And when in a management position or senior role then you go have some kids. So its all wrong these days as far as I can see. I'm struck by the differences between old world lag-behind cultures and western culture and I wonder which system has more merit? Indian migrants who drive your taxi and serve your coffee, they are young and they are married. At first I thought I was hearing things when I heard them say things like "My husband this" Or "My wife such and such" When these people are like 22 23 years old. It dawned on me that my culture has become so radically departed from the way it used to be in the days my grandparents were young uns, that I didn't even notice that I took it for granted that no one gets married anymore and that people now a days just drink drink iPhone and do 60 hour weeks and buy expensive italian consumer goods on Amex. To what end? Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! I mean we have really departed from the old norms which migrants seem to reintroduce to us anew: I heard a 22 year old Indian girl exclaim that her dream is for her mother and father in law to live in the same house as her and her husband! Holly cow! Can you believe that comment? She was serious. And so here we have genuine insight into the cultural divide between new and old western values highlighted by the reintroduction of classic living arrangements to us by the influx of migrants who hitherto live under old world economic structures and still retain them (for a time) as they move to the west to drive our taxis and serve our coffee. All I can really conclude is that with economic prosperity; families disintegrate and find individual independence which is totally liberating emotionally and financially but the side effect is feelings of disconnection and isolation that comes with not having much of a nuclear family and the long forgotten emotional benefits that it can provide.

Beverly Hills High School

Imagine if you went to high school at Beverly hills High School...Youd have a 'swim gym' where in 1939 under the depression busting great capital works programme the high school had the basketball court floor surface designed to split in two and slide out the way to reveal a 25 Yard swimming pool underneath. You'd be getting around with an odd mix of about 14% Asian, 7% Black, and 68% White students, where some 700 students also recently emerged in the school from of all places Iran! Persian students the offspring of rich people fleeing the Iranian revolution. The post code is 90212, the minority kids get in on scholarships and the other kids copy off them, prompting Beverly Hills High School to develop a kind of no cheating legislation. Plenty of stars went to this school and some families have been known to live in shabby poverty in small outer apartments in Beverly Hills for high rents, just to maintain there kids in the famous school. Obviously they see this as worth while, because of the potential social and academic strata that these boosted up kids may be exposed to. Whether or not their exposure is a positive experience or not is in doubt. Rich people only hang around with poor people if those poor people are expertly and exceptionally highly skilled sycophantic's. A culture of 100% graduation rates is there and the choice seems very unlike what Luke Perry';s character acted, where the choice is more in reality between graduation or suicide. Luke Perry was too busy wearing his leather jacket combing the elvis hair off of his wrinkly forehead and banging Kelly and Brenda et al. Speaking of Star Wars, did you know Princess Leia - Carrie Fisher, was a student at Beverly Hills High School.

Star wars points of interest

Luke Skywalker is at the end of his Yoda delivered crash course in how to use the force and be a jedi. And he has this final thing to do where Yoda goes like "Now walk into the swamp by yourself and confront your dark side master luke" and so Skywalker goes into the swamp and there - get this - he has a vision like Jedi-supernatural experience where he bumps into Vader in the swamp and chops Darth's head of with one smite of his blue light saber. So then Skywalker is transfixed by the spectacle of Darth Vader's severed helmeted noggin rolling along the ground and then the helmet face-mask explodes in electric sparks and Vader's face is revealed: And to the profound insightful mushroom-trip-like horror Skywalker discovers that the face behind Darth Vader's helmet is his own. Skywalker sees his own dead face revealed as the inhabitant of Darth Vader's get-up. Now that's some serious philosophy right there my friend

 

 

Its the young boy's optimum path of development to maturity, all young boys watch Star Wars and hope to follow in Luke Skywalker's footsteps from departing mundane domesticity to finding and hanging out with the old salt true warriors "That old Wizard" ObiWan Kinobi the veteran war fighter and Han Solo the chick banging Alpha Male who rolls foot loose and ready to fight or party. Luke learns of these guys who live by a different code to the folks back on the farm and aligned closely with the vitals of human instinct Luke learns the force from the 800 year old jackie Chan like Yoda Kung Fu master who lifts a jet fighter clear out of the submerged swampiness with the force alone despite his diminutive green skinned diminutiveness. CJ Jung said we want to kill our fathers and sleep with our mothers if that's true then luke certainly has an obsession with killing his father - Darth Vader. He even dreams about it, and although Luke's mother doesn't make an appearance, his sister does kiss him in one of the movies - Although she did this in front of Solo to make him gallous and before she knew Luke to be her brother. What is George Lukas driving at with this type of character development? Whatever the incestuous overtones or not, one thing is clear, the Star Wars movies were about killing the enemies of your community and winning yourself the right - through your heroic deeds, to bang the beautiful princess. As Han "Indiana Jones Harison-Ford Solo" then proceeds to do.

Its also good where Leia sees Indiana Jones about to get frozen in Carbon and she goes "Han I Love you" and Harrison Ford goes "I know" HAHAHA!

Further, the parallels are obvious between Darth's Evil empire and the Nazi 'Reich' Ie Storm troopers, Mg42 Machine gun like laser blasters, the Luger like hand blaster that Han Solo carries, the diabolical technologies of the Empire, the fritz helmets of the Storm troopers and the efficiency of the personnel of the Death Star. The officers' uniforms in the Death Star as well reminiscent of the 'Brown Shirts' Hitler's motley crew of street thugs he used before taking power in the 1920's. The ww2 thing continues with red leader etc as the fighter jet squadrons array like spitfires in the battle of britain.

Interestingly When Leia is awarding medals to Luke Skywalker, Han Solo et al, they walk down a great hall flanked by throngs of soldiers and VIPs reminiscent of the Nuremberg rallies, yet this spectacle of grand evil has been lifted and transposed into the victory of the rebellion's good over Vader's dictatorial evil.

The murder of Uncle Owen by storm troopers frees Luke Skywalker in a morally convenient way to escape the responsibility of mundane reality of real life on an Iowa-esque grain farm to go off to war and glory - Ultimately the movie ends with Luke's victory stride up the great hall rally to receive his medals of heroic action from the Princess in front of the watching eyes of all good society. Pity she was his sister. I'm sure the Tin-Foil-Hat-Brigade, would overlook this twist in the saga. But that's where Han solo steps in. But who is Chewbaka?

 

Some thoughts

October 2009

Some thoughts: Firstly dating sites, secondly Western attitudes (particularly hippie/alternative attitudes) that India is a pure spiritual place full of hare krishna's and reincarnation and finding enlightenment under a bode tree is overly romantic and people should wake up. India is full of entrepreneurs and scam artists and business commercial and financial oriented personalities. I just think it bares mentioning that seeking spirituality and discarding your material possessions to go to india and play sitar is actually regarded by nearly all Indians as a really stupid thing to do. The thing that's on the mind of most Indians is work work work, they don't want enlightenment and Hare Krishna freak chanting, they want wealth and lots of it. Just be aware of that.

 

Dating sites: They are hugely popular, and they provide tick boxes by the page load, for members to tick eye colour, hair type, colour, ethnicity, build of your body, "cuddly" = FAT, average, athletic etc etc. Salary range and so on too. But one thing these dating sites don't do is allow for listing of and search by faults. It occurred to me that I look at a chick in real life and note that she's got a leg missing, and that makes her less attractive to me, or that she has curly hair and that makes her less attractive to me or that she has eczema on her face or cold sores or whatever and that influences my regard of her attractiveness. But I wouldn't know if she had pimples from her profile, because the profiles are positivist and focus only on good attributes.

So I propose that a new dating site be built that makes possible the pairing of people with similar challenges. For example if I have pimples real bad or acne scars I ought to be able to find a girl who has these features and A my chances of banging her are higher (if I want to) because I'm on her level to a much greater probability than if Id found another girls through traditional dating sites who probably doesn't have the same problems and challenges as me, and secondly B, me and her can relate instantly because we have both gone through the same heavy experiences socially, that is involved in this social disadvantage of acne/acne scars. But to go one step further it often occurs to me that I don't want to have sex with a girl who has any venereal diseases. Since I don't have any myself and want to keep it that way, I find my dating activities limited and conservative. One thing that needs to be done, then, is there needs to be a dating site or section thereof, that allows for people to match their venereal diseases and pair up on that basis. If a guy has warts on his dick, maybe he should pair up with a girl who has them in her pussy?! Sick, novel, ingenious. I know, but it makes sense. "How did you meet?" "Oh we both had genital herpes on our facial lips." says the proud girlfriend......Kiss away! Some Homosexuals have bee known to infect themselves on purpose with aids so that in their subculture they can sleep around without "worry" Of course that's messed up in the head, but it highlights how important a dating site such as I propose would be to homosexuals, because it would allow them to limit their regular gang bangs to people of the same disease, thereby reducing the transmission of those diseases to new clean individuals. I imagine most of these high risk types would not give a rat's about anyone or anything anyway, but then for them we need laws that say, if you infect someone with aids, or an incurable disease, then you owe them compensation or you will be jailed heavily. I saw that if someone gave me the cold sore virus which is incurable and related to herpes, and is a stigmatised social thing, then id want that person to pay me serious money. Sound fair? That because it is! Why hasn't it been enacted yet? Because politicians are inept and they don't know much.

Also the benefit of this kind of dating, is that god forbid if you yourself ever found that through no fault of your own you were exposed through blood transfusion during car accident or pregnancy etc that you had been given blood containing an incurable venereal disease, and being the good responsible citizen that you are, you find that your dating options are now non existent, abiding by your wish not to infect anyone else, so you abstain like a monk or you act like a criminal and spread disease. So what do you do? Simple! There is an answer! Go to fugly dating . com and enter your disease/s and find out who you can bang in moral correctness. This way Pam Anderson can find another Tommy Lee and bang in the knowledge that they are not spreading Hepatitis to a clean partner. This is an idea born of moral responsibility and health consciousness. I reckon it would be roaringly popular.

 

 

 
 

 

 

© 2008 2010 Anticharisma.com Don't copy this work! Purchase Privacy policy Home